Tuesday, June 10, 2014

New Memo from CMS on HIPPS code reporting for MA Plans

A copy of this memo is on the "resources" section of my website:  www.judywilhide.com




 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 
7500 Security Boulevard 
Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 
CENTER FOR MEDICARE 
MEDICARE PLAN PAYMENT GROUP 
TO: All Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs), PACE Organizations, Cost Plans, and certain Demonstrations 
FROM: Cheri Rice, Director 
Medicare Plan Payment Group 
SUBJECT: Submission of Health Insurance Prospective Payment System (HIPPS) Codes to Encounter Data System 
DATE: May 23, 2014 
As noted in the November 4, 2013 HPMS memo, “Encounter Data Submission of HIPPS Codes,” the disposition for the HIPPS codes edits will be changed from ‘Informational’ to ‘Reject’ effective with July 1, 2014 dates of service (DOS) for any Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and Home Health Agency (HHA) encounters submitted without HIPPS codes. The purpose of this memo is to provide additional details about this requirement, and encourage MAOs and other entities to continue to work with SNF and HHA providers to meet this requirement. 
I. HIPPS Codes for SNF Encounters Starting with July 1, 2014 Dates of Service 

CMS is clarifying that for 2014 DOS beginning on or after July 1st, MAOs must submit a HIPPS code on a SNF encounter that comes from the initial OBRA-required comprehensive assessment (Admission Assessment). Specifically, SNF encounters with “from” dates July 1, 2014 or after that are submitted without a HIPPS code will be rejected. The OBRA-required tracking records and assessments are federally mandated for all residents of Medicare and/or Medicaid certified SNFs and nursing facilities. 
For 2014 encounter data submissions, CMS will not require MAOs to submit HIPPS codes from any other OBRA-required comprehensive or non-comprehensive assessments; we also will not require submission of HIPPS codes for any scheduled or unscheduled SNF Prospective Payment System (PPS) assessments. Nevertheless, we do encourage you to submit the HIPPS codes both from other OBRA assessments and from PPS assessments when available from the providers. We especially encourage submission of the HIPPS code based on the Discharge Assessment, which is based on a OBRA-required assessment. 2 


II. HIPPS Codes for HHA Encounters Starting with July 1, 2014 Dates of Service 

CMS is clarifying that for 2014 DOS beginning on or after July 1st, MAOs must submit a HIPPS code on an HHA encounter that comes from the initial Outcome and Assessment Information Set (Start of Care assessment), or OASIS. The OASIS assessments are federally mandated for all Medicare and/or Medicaid patients receiving skilled care from HHAs. 
For 2014 encounter data submissions, CMS will not require MAOs to submit HIPPS codes from any other assessments. Nevertheless, we do encourage you to submit the HIPPS codes from any completed assessments when available from the providers. 
III. Additional Information 

HIPPS codes from SNF or HHA encounters with “from” dates prior to July 1, 2014 may be submitted. 
We remind MAOs that SNF and home health encounters must be submitted in the 837-Institutional format. 
For your reference, attached is an appendix with an overview of SNF and HHA assessments, and resources on HIPPS codes. 
We encourage MAOs and other entities to share the information in this memo with their providers. Please send any questions related to this guidance to encounterdata@cms.hhs.gov and specify ‘HPMS memo-HIPPS Codes’ in the subject line. 3 

Appendix. Overview of HIPPS Codes from SNF and HHA Assessments 
Health Insurance Prospective Payment System (HIPPS) rate codes represent specific sets of patient characteristics (or case-mix groups) on which payment determinations are made under several prospective payment systems. Case-mix groups are developed based on research into utilization patterns among various provider types. 
For the payment systems that use HIPPS codes, clinical assessment data is the basic input used to determine which case-mix group applies to a particular patient. A standard patient assessment instrument is interpreted by case-mix grouping software algorithms, which assign the case mix group. For payment purposes, at least one HIPPS code is defined to represent each case-mix group. 
SNF HIPPS codes are determined based on assessments made using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) data collection tools. 
Home Health HIPPS codes are determined based on assessments made using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data collection tools. 
See the following document for more information regarding HIPPS codes: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ProspMedicareFeeSvcPmtGen/Downloads/hippsusesv4.pdf
I. Clinical Assessment Data from Skilled Nursing Facilities 

The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 consists of standardized data items that must be collected during assessments of all residents of facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The MDS 3.0 represents a core set of screening, clinical, and functional status elements that provide extensive information on the resident’s nursing and therapy needs, ADL impairments, cognitive status, behavioral problems, and medical diagnoses. 
The MDS 3.0 comprises several different assessments, under two different sets of requirements: OBRA assessments and Medicare PPS assessments. 
A. OBRA Assessments 
The OBRA-required assessments apply to Medicare and/or Medicaid certified (as well as dually certified under both programs) facilities and include the initial and periodic assessments of all their residents. For residents on a Medicare Part A stay, SNFs use information from the MDS 3.0 assessment to classify their residents into a series of groups representing the residents’ relative direct care resource requirements, or Resource Utilization Groups (RUGs), which are necessary for payment. The RUG-IV classification system is the current SNF PPS case-mix classification system. 
HIPPS codes are determined based on the information recorded on the MDS assessments. Grouper software run at a SNF or swing bed hospital uses specific data elements from the MDS to assign beneficiaries to a RUG-IV code. The Grouper outputs the RUG-IV code, 4 

which must be combined with the Assessment Indicator (AI) to create the HIPPS code. The HIPPS code is then entered on the claim. 
Each Medicare claim contains a five-position HIPPS code for the purpose of billing Part A covered days. The first three positions of the HIPPS code contain the RUG-IV group code to be billed for Medicare payment. The RUG-IV group is calculated from the MDS assessment clinical data. The last two positions of the HIPPS code represent the Assessment Indicator (AI), identifying the assessment type. The AI coding system indicates the different types of assessments that define different PPS payment periods. 
For more information on the HIPPS Code, see Publication 100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 6 - SNF Inpatient Part A Billing and SNF Consolidated Billing, 30.1 - HIPPS Rate Code. 
There are both Federally-mandated comprehensive and non-comprehensive OBRA assessments: 
OBRA comprehensive assessments include: 
1. Admission Assessment, 
2. Annual Assessment, 
3. Significant Change in Status Assessment, and 
4. Significant Correction to Prior Comprehensive Assessment. 

OBRA non-comprehensive assessments include: 
1. Quarterly Assessment, 
2. Significant Correction to Prior Quarterly Assessment, and 
3. Discharge Assessments (return anticipated and return not anticipated). 

Non-comprehensive assessments do not contain all MDS data elements. Note that discharge assessments are unique in that they not only include clinical items for quality monitoring, but also capture discharge tracking information when the resident leaves the SNFs. 
B. Required Medicare PPS Assessments 
Medicare PPS assessments are required for FFS payment purposes under Medicare Part A. 
Medicare PPS assessments are either scheduled or unscheduled, and similarly provide information about the clinical condition of beneficiaries receiving Part A SNF-level care in order to be paid under the SNF PPS for both SNFs and Swing Bed providers. Scheduled assessments occur at specific points during a Medicare Part A stay and include the 5-day, 14-day, 30-day, 60-day and 90-day assessments. Under Medicare FFS, scheduled assessments set the reimbursement rate for a given period of time, which normally consists of a 2 to 4 week period. 
Unscheduled assessments, as opposed to scheduled assessments, are not completed at regular intervals during the Part A stay, but are instead triggered by particular events which may 5 

occur during the stay. Events that may trigger the completion of an unscheduled assessment may include when there are significant changes in the status of the resident (Significant Change in Status Assessment or SCSA), therapy starts and/or ends (Start of Therapy or SOT, End of Therapy or EOT), the level of therapy changes (Change of Therapy or COT), or when there is a significant error identified in an assessment that must be corrected (Significant Correction). When an unscheduled assessment is completed, there may be implications regarding payment, and the facility needs to be aware that an increase or decrease of payment may occur based on potential changes in the RUG-IV as a result of the completion of an unscheduled assessment. 
Since all residents of the facility must have OBRA assessments completed, whether in FFS Medicare or enrolled in an MA plan, the residents who are on Medicare Part A must have both types of assessments completed during their stay. In order to reduce assessment burden, a SNF may combine certain assessments to satisfy both OBRA and Medicare requirements for payment under Medicare FFS. Additionally, Medicare Scheduled and Unscheduled assessments, or two Medicare Unscheduled assessments, may be combined. Two Medicare-required Scheduled assessments may never be combined since these assessments have specific assessment windows that do not occur at the same time. The timeframes and instructions regarding the completion and/or combination of assessments vary, so it is imperative that staff fully understand the requirements for all types of assessments in order to ensure appropriate reimbursement, avoid unnecessary duplication of effort and to remain in compliance with Medicare PPS and OBRA requirements. 
C. Other SNF Resources 

See CMS’ Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument User’s Manual, specifically Chapter 2: Assessments for the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and Chapter 6: Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (SNF PPS). The manual can be accessed at: 
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/NursingHomeQualityInits/MDS30RAIManual.html
The CMS SNF Medicare Claims Processing Manual can be accessed at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Internet-Only-Manuals-IOMs.html
II. Clinical Assessment Data from Home Health Agencies 

A. OASIS Assessments 

Medicare-certified HHAs are required to collect a standard set of data items, known as OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set), as part of a comprehensive assessment of all patients who are receiving skilled care that is reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid. OASIS data elements must be collected for both traditional fee-for-service (HH PPS) and Managed Care (Medicare Advantage) patients (with the exception of certain groups of patients such as those receiving only non-skilled services). 6 

The OASIS is a group of data elements that represent core items of a comprehensive assessment for an adult home care patient, and that form the basis for measuring patient outcomes for purposes of Outcome-Based Quality Improvement (OBQI). This assessment is used both to measure changes in a patient’s clinical and functional status between the start and end of care and for risk-adjustment purposes. Completion of the OASIS, among other assessments, is one of the requirements an HHA must meet to participate in the Medicare program as set forth in the Medicare payment regulations and conditions of participation. 
HIPPS codes are determined based on assessments made using OASIS. Under the HH PPS, a case-mix adjusted payment for an episode of care (60 days) is made by CMS using one of 153 Home Health Resource Groups (HHRGs). Accordingly, on Medicare claims these HHRGs are reflected as HIPPS codes, which are determined using data from the OASIS assessments. OASIS is required for Medicare and Medicaid patients only. 
For OASIS-C1/ICD-9 (most recent updated data set), these are the data collection and submission requirements required at these specific time points: 
1. Start of Care 
2. Resumption of Care (after an inpatient stay) 
3. Follow-Up (Recertification assessment/other follow-up assessment) 
4. Transfer to an Inpatient Facility 

(Transferred to an inpatient facility—patient not discharged from an agency and Transferred to an inpatient facility—patient discharged from agency) 
5. Discharge from Agency – Not to an Inpatient Facility (Death at home and discharge from agency) 

The grouper software run at a HHA uses specific data elements from the OASIS data set to assign beneficiaries a HIPPS code. The Grouper outputs the HIPPS code, which must be entered on the claim. 
For more information on the HIPPS Codes, see Publication 100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, 10.1.9 - Composition of HIPPS Codes for HH PPS. 
B. Other HH Resources 

You can access manuals on the CMS Home Health Quality Initiative homepage such related to the OASIS OBQI/Outcome-Based Quality Improvement Reports and OASIS OBQM/Outcome-Based Quality Monitoring Reports at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HomeHealthQualityInits/index.html. The OASIS-C1 Data Set can be accessed through this link. 
In addition, the CMS HH Medicare Claims Processing Manual can be accessed at: 

http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Internet-Only-Manuals-IOMs.html

Saturday, May 31, 2014

URGENT: Training for Virginia Providers participating in the CCC Dual Eligible Program

I urge all Virginia providers who will be participating in the Commonwealth Coordinated Care Dual Eligible pilot program to attend this training by the VHCA.  

Please join us for the Virginia Health Care Association's conference on June 17th & 18th at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Richmond - Midlothian. This educational program, T-Minus: Preparing for the Launch of the Commonwealth Coordinated Care Program is designed to bring the latest information about Virginia's Commonwealth Coordinated Care (CCC) program to our members.

Nursing facilities will hear directly from the care management teams for the three Medicare-Medicaid Plans (MMPs) about their own perspectives and plans for care management and coordination for dual eligible beneficiaries enrolled in the CCC.  Attendees will also hear about important legal considerations that providers should understand about this new program. On day two, leaders from the Department of Medical Assistance Services and the Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Resources will brief attendees on key CCC operational and implementation developments. The program will conclude with a discussion of important managed care operational strategies that nursing facilities should evaluate.

At the conclusion of this program, participants will be able to:
  • Identify key Commonwealth Coordinated Care operational and financial issues of importance to nursing facility providers.
  • Understand the core legal documents and agreements that serve as the foundation for the Commonwealth Coordinated Care program.
  • Be aware of how the Commonwealth Coordinated Care will impact beneficiary post-acute care options for skilled services.
  • Understand how the Commonwealth Coordinated Care program launch will impact the facility's resident population receiving long term care services.
  • Describe the care management approaches of each of the three MMPs contracted for the Commonwealth Coordinated Care program.
  • Identify important operational strategies for successful participation in the Commonwealth Coordinated Care program.
Who Should Attend?  Administrators, DONs, MDS Coordinators, Therapy Managers, Social Workers, Discharge Planners, Corporate Clinical, Operations and Finance Staff.

Registration and brochure information for T-Minus: Preparing for the Launch of the Commonwealth Coordinated Care Program is now available online.

Here is the latest update on the project by VHCA:

Commonwealth Coordinated Care Update

On May 28th, the Department of Medical Assistance Services (DMAS) communicated that problems had been discovered in the beneficiary assignment approach utilized to assigned dual eligibles to an individual Medicare-Medicaid Plan (MMP) within the Tidewater region of the Commonwealth Coordinated Care (CCC) program.  As a result, it appears that an unspecified number of individuals now receiving services in nursing facilities located within the Tidewater region will receive letters from the CCC enrollment broker, Maximus, indicating that they have been reassigned to a new MMP.  Based upon earlier DMAS projections of the number of dual eligible beneficiaries receiving nursing facility services in Tidewater, we estimate that as many as 600 individuals could be subject to the MMP reassignment.  The May 28th communication indicates that for the individuals being reassigned, their CCC coverage will begin August 1, 2014, one month later than previously announced.  The DMAS communication does not indicate how, or if, providers will be notified about which of their residents have been reassigned.

The DMAS announcement further indicates that the effective date for the start of coverage for beneficiaries automatically or passively enrolled in the Richmond/Central CCC region has been moved back one month to September 1, 2014.  Launch dates in the three remaining CCC regions remain the same.

Thursday, May 22, 2014

REVISED RULES PROPOSED ON CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/05/12/2014-10394/medicare-and-state-health-care-programs-fraud-and-abuse-revisions-to-the-office-of-inspector

REVISED RULES PROPOSED ON CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has published a proposed rule, seeking comments on revisions to the rules associated with Civil Monetary Penalties (CMP) for fraud and abuse. The Affordable Care Act significantly expanded OIG's authority to protect Federal healthcare programs from fraud and abuse. The proposed rule codifies the changes for:
  • Failure to grant OIG timely access to records
  • Ordering or prescribing while excluded
  • Making false statements, omissions, or misrepresentations in an enrollment application
  • Failure to report and return an overpayment
  • Making or using a false record or statement that is material to a false or fraudulent claim
MDSC:  when you modify an MDS and it lowers the PPS RUG, that is an overpayment that must be returned to the treasury. There is no time limit on returning overpayments.

Friday, May 9, 2014

CMS Fact Sheet: SNF Proposed Rule

Fact sheets: Proposed fiscal year 2015 payment and policy changes for Medicare Skilled Nursing Facilities

Date
2014-05-01
Title
Proposed fiscal year 2015 payment and policy changes for Medicare Skilled Nursing Facilities
For Immediate Release
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Contact
press@cms.hhs.gov
Proposed fiscal year 2015 payment and policy changes for Medicare Skilled Nursing Facilities
Overview
On May 1, 2014, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule [CMS-1605-P] outlining proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Medicare payment rates for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The FY 2015 proposals and other issues discussed in the proposed rule are summarized below.
Changes to Payment Rates under the SNF Prospective Payment System (PPS)
Based on proposed changes contained within this rule, CMS projects that aggregate payments to SNFs will increase by $750 million, or 2.0 percent, from payments in FY 2014, which represents a higher update factor than the 1.3 percent update finalized for SNFs last year. This estimated increase is attributable to 2.4 percent market basket increase, reduced by the 0.4 percentage point multifactor productivity adjustment required by law.
Wage Index Update
On February 28, 2013, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued OMB Bulletin No. 13-01, which contained a number of significant changes related to the delineation of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitian Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and guidance on uses of the delineation of these areas. To align with these changes, CMS is proposing revisions to the wage index based on the newest OMB delineations for the FY 2015 SNF PPS wage index. CMS is also proposing to use the new OMB delineations to identify a provider’s urban or rural status for the purpose of determining which set of rate tables would apply to the provider. This is consistent with other Medicare payment rules which will also include similar revisions this year as a result of the new OMB delineations.
In an effort to mitigate the potential negative wage index impacts for some providers of this proposed adoption of the revised OMB delineations, CMS is proposing to implement these changes by providing a one-year transition with a blended wage index for all providers. The wage index for each provider would consist of a blend of 50 percent of the FY 2015 wage index using the current OMB delineations and 50 percent of the FY 2015 wage index using the revised OMB delineations. A similar transition wage index was used when CMS adopted the OMB’s Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA) definitions in FY 2006.
Change of Therapy assessment policy update
The Change of Therapy (COT) Other Medicare Required Assessment (OMRA) is used to classify a resident into a new resource utilization group (RUG) when, based on the therapy services provided during the previous seven days, the resident no longer qualifies for the RUG into which they are currently classified for payment. Recently, some providers have raised concerns regarding a technical aspect of the rules governing when the COT OMRA may be completed, which generally limits the use of the COT OMRA to instances where the resident is already classified into a therapy RUG.
Therefore, CMS is proposing a revision to the current COT OMRA policy to address this concern, which would permit providers to use the COT OMRA to reclassify a resident into a therapy RUG from a non-therapy RUG, but only in certain limited circumstances.
Civil Monetary Penalties
The proposed rule provides clarification of statutory requirements under Section 6111 of the Affordable Care Act regarding the approval and use of Civil Money Penalties (CMPs) imposed by CMS against nursing facilities. We clarify that states may use federal CMP funds only after obtaining prior approval from CMS, and may not use these funds if CMS has disapproved their intended use, or use these funds for purposes other than to support activities that benefit residents as specified in statute. CMS also proposes that States provide more public transparency on the projects that have been funded by CMP funds.
The proposed rule went on display on May 1 at the Federal Register’s Public Inspection Desk and will be available under “Special Filings,” at http://www.federalregister.gov/inspection.aspx.
For further information, see http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/SNFPPS/index.html. Public comments on the proposal will be accepted until June 30, 2014.

Monday, May 5, 2014

SNF Pepper Reports Now Available On-line


Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report
Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report 
PEPPER feedback button

  

The Q4FY13 release of your new Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER), with statistics through September 2013, is now available for download through the Secure PEPPER Access page atPEPPERresources.org. To obtain your SNF's PEPPER, the Chief Executive Officer, President or Administrator of your SNF should: 
  1. Review the Secure PEPPER Access Guide.
  2. Visit the Secure PEPPER Access page at PEPPERresources.org.
  3. Review the instructions and obtain the information required to authenticate access.
  4. Click on the button to Access the Secure Portal.
  5. Complete all the fields.
  6. Download your PEPPER. 
The SNF PEPPER will be available to download as a Microsoft Excel file for approximately one year. The previous Q4FY12 SNF PEPPER, originally released in August 2013, will be made available via the Secure PEPPER Portal in the summer of 2014; an email notification will be sent when these PEPPERs are available.

New for this release in the SNF PEPPER: The "State" comparison group now includes all SNFs in a state. Previously, the "State" comparison group included all SNFs in a state that were in the same MAC jurisdiction. As a result, state percentiles will be available for most SNFs; state percentiles will differ from the previous PEPPER release.
 
For more information, visit the SNF Training and Resources section ofPEPPERresources.org.

About PEPPER
PEPPER is an educational tool that summarizes provider-specific data statistics for Medicare services that may be at risk for improper payments. Providers can use the data to support internal auditing and monitoring activities. Visit PEPPERresources.org to access resources for using PEPPER, including recorded web-based training sessions, a sample SNF PEPPER and the current SNF PEPPER User's Guide, which are available on the SNF "Training and Resources" page. PEPPER is distributed by TMF® Health Quality Institute under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Do you have questions or comments about PEPPER or need help obtaining your report? Visit our Help Desk to request assistance with PEPPER. Provide your feedback or suggestions regarding PEPPER through our feedback form

The PEPPER Team 

Sunday, April 20, 2014

CMS Announces Two New Focused Surveys


 Memorandum Summary 
Focused Nursing Home Surveys Under Development: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is currently developing two distinct focused survey processes to assess dementia care and Minimum Data Set, Version 3.0 (MDS 3.0) coding practices in nursing homes. CMS is planning to pilot these survey types beginning in 2014. The intent of the dementia care focused survey is to document dementia care practices in nursing homes. The intent of the MDS focused survey is to document MDS 3.0 coding practices and associated care planning in facilities. 
Training: CMS will provide training for those States participating in the focused reviews via webinar. This training will be mandatory for those State Survey Agency (SA) staff conducting reviews as well as one manager or trainer within the SA. 

Enforcement Implications: Deficient practices noted during the survey will result in relevant citations.

The S&C Letter is found here:  http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/Downloads/Survey-and-Cert-Letter-14-22.pdf

Monday, March 31, 2014

SENATE PASSES ICD-10 DELAY BILL: AHIMA Alert

Today, the US Senate voted to approve H.R. 4302, Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, which included language delaying the implementation of ICD-10-CM/PCS by at least one year. The vote was 64 to 35 at 6:59 p.m. ET. The bill now moves to President Obama, who is expected to sign it into law.

The H.R. 4302 bill mainly creates a temporary "fix" to the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR). But a seven-line section of the bill states that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot adopt the ICD–10 code set as the mandatory standard until at least October 1, 2015—a year after the October 1, 2014 implementation date for which the industry has been preparing.
AHIMA to Seek Immediate Clarification on Technical Issues
Effects of a one year delay include an estimated likely cost of $1 billion to $6.6 billion to the healthcare industry and lost opportunity costs for failing to move to a more effective code set. A cloud will also be cast over the employment prospects of more than 25,000 students who have learned to code exclusively in ICD-10 in HIM associate and baccalaureate educational programs. In a statement on the Senate vote, AHIMA officials said they will work to clarify outstanding questions raised by the delay and continue to work with government officials to implement ICD-10.
"On behalf of our more than 72,000 members who have prepared for ICD-10 in good faith, AHIMA will seek immediate clarification on a number of technical issues such as the exact length of the delay," said AHIMA CEO Lynne Thomas Gordon, MBA, RHIA, CAE, FACHE, FAHIMA. "AHIMA will continue our work with various public sector organizations and agencies such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, and the National Center for Health Statistics, along with our industry partners such as the ICD-10 Coalition so that ICD-10 will realize its full potential to improve patient care and reduce costs. These are goals that AHIMA and other healthcare stakeholders and our government leaders all share."
AHIMA Thanks Members and ICD-10 Proponents for Remarkable Grassroots Fight
AHIMA thanks its members and other stakeholders for their efforts over the last six days to stop an ICD-10 implementation delay. Proponents of ICD-10 responded to AHIMA's call for a grassroots campaign by making nearly 10,000 phone calls and sending over 1,000 letters to their elected representatives, urging them to vote against an ICD-10 delay and to pass a clean SGR bill. ICD-10 supporters also took to social media, with messages on Twitter containing the hashtag #NoDelay numbering more than 5,000, including several thousand during this morning's hour-long virtual rally. During that hour, a flood of tweets on the topic of ICD-10 catapulted hashtag #ICD10 onto Twitter's "trending topics" list.
While today's vote has delayed ICD-10 implementation, AHIMA will be working to ensure that another delay does not occur legislatively. In the coming weeks, updates will be added to AHIMA's Advocacy Assistant with instructions on how members can continue to advocate for ICD-10.

For more on today's vote and what happens next, visit the Journal of AHIMA website.