Wednesday, September 30, 2015

From HHS OIG: Another Study Saying SNFs are Overpaid for Therapy

The Medicare Payment System for Skilled Nursing Facilities Needs To Be Reevaluated

WHY WE DID THIS STUDY 

OIG, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, and other entities have raised longstanding concerns regarding Medicare's skilled nursing facility (SNF) payment system. These concerns focus on SNF billing, the method of paying for therapy, and the extent to which Medicare payments exceed SNFs' costs. Medicare pays SNFs a daily rate for nursing, therapy, and other services. The daily rate for therapy is primarily based on the amount of therapy provided, regardless of the specific beneficiary characteristics or care needs. 
Previously, OIG found that SNFs increasingly billed for the highest level of therapy even though key characteristics of SNF beneficiaries remained largely unchanged from 2006 to 2008. OIG also found that SNFs billed one quarter of all 2009 claims in error-primarily by billing for higher levels of therapy than they provided or were reasonable or necessary-which resulted in $1.5 billion in inappropriate Medicare payments. This study provides further evidence that supports and quantifies these concerns.

HOW WE DID THIS STUDY

This study was based on several data sources, including Medicare Part A SNF claims, Medicare cost reports, and beneficiary assessments. We used Medicare cost reports to compare Medicare payments to SNFs' costs for therapy over a 10-year period. We used claims to determine the extent to which SNF billing and beneficiary characteristics changed from fiscal years (FYs) 2011 to 2013. Finally, we determined the extent to which changes in SNF billing affected Medicare payments. 

WHAT WE FOUND

We found that Medicare payments for therapy greatly exceeded SNFs' costs for therapy. We also found that under the current payment system, SNFs increasingly billed for the highest level of therapy even though key beneficiary characteristics remained largely the same. Increases in SNF billing-particularly for the highest level of therapy-resulted in $1.1 billion in Medicare payments in FYs 2012 and 2013.

WHAT WE RECOMMEND 

The findings of this and prior OIG reports demonstrate the need for CMS to reevaluate the Medicare SNF payment system. Payment reform could save Medicare billions of dollars and encourage SNFs to provide services that are better aligned with beneficiaries' care needs. We recommend that CMS: (1) evaluate the extent to which Medicare payment rates for therapy should be reduced, (2) change the method for paying for therapy, (3) adjust Medicare payments to eliminate any increases that are unrelated to beneficiary characteristics, and (4) strengthen oversight of SNF billing. CMS concurred with all four of our recommendations.
Copies can also be obtained by contacting the Office of Public Affairs at Public.Affairs@oig.hhs.gov.
Download the complete report.

North Carolina Only: Guidance from Case Mix Reviewers

From North Carolina Newsletter published by Myers & Stauffer:

If you would like to be among the first to receive seminar notifications, newsletters, resources, etc., please send an email to nchelpdesk@mslc.com to subscribe to our notification list. When sending your
message, please type “subscribe” in the subject line. In the body of the message, please include
your full name, title, phone number and facility/company name.

Q: We are implementing electronic ADL documentation; what do we need to know in order to meet the Supportive Documentation Guidelines for ADLs?

A: The Supportive Documentation Guidelines for the late loss ADLs require that the keys for self performance and support provided must include all the MDS/ADL key options (key of “7” for self performance is optional) and be equivalent to the intent and definition of the MDS/ADL key. Keep in mind that this applies to either electronic or paper ADL documentation. As part of the review, the RN Reviewer will ask to look at the actual kiosk or computer being used by staff to enter ADL documentation to verify that the language used is equivalent to the intent and definition of the MDS/ADL key. A computer screen that simply shows a picture of an ADL activity, or uses words or phrases (such as “resident does
more than staff”) that are not equivalent to the MDS/ADL key, will result in the ADL values
associated with those keys being unsupported for the review. An electronic system that “converts” these keys to the MDS/ADL key that is printed with the ADLs for the RN reviewer, does not meet the Supportive Documentation Guidelines. Any corrections made to ADL
values must be part of the legal medical record and meet the Medical Record Correction
Policy for MDS Validation Reviews

Monday, September 21, 2015

Casper User's Guide and MDS 3.0 User's Guide have been updated

These two guides are found here.

New QM Manual Version 9,0

September 21, 2015

MDS 3.0 QM User’s Manual V9.0 contains detailed specification for the MDS 3.0 quality measures. MDS 3.0 QM User’s Manual V9.0 is available under the Downloads section of this page. This new file, Effective October 1, 2015, includes two key changes.  First, there are two changes to the influenza vaccine measures: a change in time period for calculation of the measures and a change to a single calculation per year. Second, there is a change to the missing values for risk adjusted measures, such that missing values for items used to calculate coefficients result in resident being assigned to the ‘low risk’ category, rather than being dropped from the calculation.
The QM User’s Manual V9.0 can be found here.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

News from Virginia Survey Director at Stakeholder meeting this week

The six (not five)  MDS/Staffing focused surveys for Phase 1 of the national roll out have been completed.  Virginia has not volunteered further for the dementia or medication management pilot programs.
I have posted results of 4 of the 6.  OLC declined to discuss results of these surveys. If the other two that happened in the last two weeks will tell me how they did, I will consolidate and publish the results.  Thanks,  Judy

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Virginia Medicaid: Phase 1 of mandated CCC enrollment has been cancelled

Public Announcement at DMAS Board meeting today:

Phase 1 of mandated Medicaid enrollment in the CCC has been cancelled (was scheduled for July 2016).
The 2 year extension of CCC offered by CMS will be rejected. In the spring there will be an RFP for MLTSS to begin a phase in, July 2017.


This gives this prior request for feedback suddenly very cogent:

From: Driscoll, Tammy (DMAS) [mailto:Tammy.Driscoll@dmas.virginia.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 8:03 AM
To: A602-DMAS-MB-VAMLTSS (DMAS)
Cc: Burhop, Kristin (DMAS); Driscoll, Tammy (DMAS); Gore, Suzanne (DMAS); Huffstetler, Molly (DMAS); Kimsey, Karen (DMAS); Lee, Meredith (DMAS); Rockwell, Seon (DMAS); Smith, Terry (DMAS); Trestrail, Jeanette (DMAS); Whitlock, Tammy (DMAS)
Subject: Request for Stakeholder Input on the MLTSS Model of Care Due 9/30/2015 by 5 PM

Good Morning:

The Department of Medical Assistance Services (DMAS) appreciates your support with and feedback on the significant reforms that the department has undertaken in the past few years.  In an effort to better serve Medicaid enrollees, and as shared in previous communications, over the next couple of years, DMAS plans to transition individuals served primarily through fee-for-service into a Managed Long Term Services and Supports (MLTSS) program.  These populations include dual eligibles, and individuals who receive full Medicaid and long-term services and supports (LTSS), either through an institution (e.g., nursing facility) or through one of DMAS’ six (6) home and community based services (HCBS) waivers.  At this time the expansion of Medicaid managed care for individuals enrolled in the Day Support for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities (DS); Intellectual Disabilities (ID); and, Individual and Family Developmental Disabilities Support (DD) Waivers is being considered for their acute and primary care services, only.  While DMAS is exploring the feasibility of managed or integrated care models for the ID, DD, and DS Waivers, these individuals will continue to receive their home and community-based LTSS through Medicaid fee-for-service until the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services completes the redesign of these Waivers.     

Additional details on the proposed MLTSS initiatives are available on the DMAS website at: http://www.dmas.virginia.gov/Content_pgs/mltss-home.aspx.  DMAS will continue to post updates regarding the MLTSS initiatives at this website location as these are made available.

DMAS respects the strong interest of stakeholder groups and values your input on important program design elements as we move forward with this proposed MLTSS initiative.  One of the design components that DMAS would appreciate your input on is the Model of Care. The Model of Care is an integral component of the current Commonwealth Coordinated Care (CCC) Program.  As in the CCC Program, the Model of Care will be an essential component of the proposed MLTSS initiative because it will help ensure that the unique needs of the enrolled beneficiaries are identified and addressed by outlining the program’s expected policies, procedures, and operational systems.  The Model of Care will encompass a comprehensive set of requirements and expectations for the health plans, including, but not limited to, timeframes for Health Risk Assessments (HRAs), person-centered care planning, and expectations that individualized plans of care are created for each member and shared with the member and other parties involved in managing the member’s care (e.g., primary care physicians, caregivers/family members, care coordinators, etc.).

Internally, DMAS is reviewing the current CCC Model of Care and is considering revisions that should be made for the proposed MLTSS initiative.  We also seek your input on revisions and suggestions that should be considered as we continue to design the proposed MLTSS initiative.  Please feel free to review and comment on the entire Model of Care or specific elements.

The elements, and requirements associated with each element, of the current CCC Model of Care that are being considered for inclusion in the proposed MLTSS initiative include*:

1.            Description of the Plan-specific Target Population;
2.            Measurable Goals;
3.            Staff Structure and Care Management Goals;
4.            Interdisciplinary Care Team;
5.            Provider Network having Specialized Expertise and Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Protocols;
6.            Model of Care Training for Personnel and Provider Network;
7.            Health Risk Assessment;
8.            Individualized Service and Support Plan;
9.            Communication Network;
10.          Service and Support Management for the Most Vulnerable Subpopulations;
11.          Performance and Health Outcomes Measurement, to Include §1915(c) Waiver Assurances;
12.          Hospital and Nursing Facility Transition Programs;
13.          Enhanced Service and Support Management for Vulnerable Subpopulations; and,
14.          Partnering with Community Service and Support Management Providers.

*please see attached for the entire Model of Care language*  (Scroll down)

If you or your organization would like to submit input, please send them to VAMLTSS@dmas.virginia.gov by 5:00 p.m. on September 30, 2015.  We appreciate your input and interest as we continue to develop the proposed MLTSS initiative.

Thank you!

Tammy Driscoll
Senior Programs Advisor to the Deputy of Complex Care and Services
Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services (DMAS)
600 East Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23219
804-225-2552

Entire Model of Care Language:
Model of Care Elements
1.  Description of the plan-specific Target Population (based on target population of full duals as defined by the State)

The plan’s response to Element #1 (Description of the Plan-specific Target Population) must include all Virginia-specific sub-populations of dual eligibles as follows:
a.     Individuals enrolled in the Elderly or Disabled with Consumer Direction (EDCD) waiver;
b.     Individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities;
c.     Individuals with cognitive or memory problems (e.g., dementia and traumatic brain injury);
d.     Individuals with physical or sensory disabilities;
e.     Individuals residing in nursing facilities;
f.      Individuals with serious and persistent mental illnesses;
g.     Individuals with end stage renal disease,
h.     Individuals with complex or multiple chronic conditions; and
i.      Individuals who have no reported medical, behavioral health, or long-term service and support (LTSS) needs but may have needs in the future.
Responses to the Model of Care section should take into account the fact that many enrolled individuals will have co-occurring conditions and could be included in more than one sub-population. Populations identified in items a – h are also included as “Vulnerable Subpopulations” in Element #10.

2.  Measurable Goals
a.     Describe the specific goals including:
1.     Improving access to essential services such as medical, mental health, and social services
2.     Improving access to affordable care
3.     Improving coordination of care through an identified point of contact (e.g., gatekeeper)
4.     Improving seamless transitions of care across healthcare settings, providers, and health services
5.     Improving access to preventive health services
6.     Assuring appropriate utilization of services
7.     Improving beneficiary health outcomes (specify organization selected health outcome measures)
b.     Describe the goals as measurable outcomes and indicate how the organization will know when goals are met
c.     Discuss actions the organization will take if goals are not met in the expected time frame

The state has no further requirements beyond those listed above in Element # 2.

3.  Staff Structure and Care Management Roles
a.     Identify the specific employed or contracted staff to perform administrative functions (e.g., process enrollments, verify eligibility, process claims, etc.)
b.     Identify the specific employed or contracted staff to perform clinical functions (e.g., coordinate care management, provide clinical care, educate beneficiaries on self-management techniques, consult on pharmacy issues, counsel on drug dependence rehab strategies, etc.)
c.     Identify the specific employed or contracted staff to perform administrative and clinical oversight functions (e.g., verifies licensing and competency, reviews encounter data for appropriateness and timeliness of services, reviews pharmacy claims and utilization data for appropriateness, assures provider use of clinical practice guidelines, etc.)


4.  Interdisciplinary Care Team (ICT)
a.     Describe the composition of the ICT and how the organization determined the membership
b.     Describe how the organization will facilitate the participation of the beneficiary whenever feasible
c.    Describe how the ICT will operate and communicate (e.g., frequency of meetings, documentation of proceedings and retention of records, notification about ICT meetings, dissemination of ICT reports to all stakeholders, etc.)


5.  Provider Network having Specialized Expertise and Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Protocols
a.     Describe the specialized expertise in the organization’s provider network that corresponds to the target population including facilities and providers (e.g., medical specialists, mental health specialists, dialysis facilities, specialty outpatient clinics, etc.)
b.     Describe how the organization determined that its network facilities and providers were actively licensed and competent
c.     Describe who determines which services beneficiaries will receive (e.g., is there a gatekeeper, and if not, how is the beneficiary connected to the appropriate service provider, etc.)
d.     Describe how the provider network coordinates with the ICT and the beneficiary to deliver specialized services (e.g., how care needs are communicated to all stakeholders, which personnel assures follow-up is scheduled and performed, how it assures that specialized services are delivered to the beneficiary in a timely and quality way, how reports on services delivered are shared with the plan and ICT for maintenance of a complete beneficiary record and incorporation into the care plan, how services are delivered across care settings and providers, etc.)
e.     Describe how the organization assures that providers use evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and nationally recognized protocols (e.g., review of medical records, pharmacy records, medical specialist reports, audio/video-conferencing to discuss protocols and clinical guidelines, written protocols providers send to the organization’s Medical Director for review, etc.)

The state has no further requirements beyond those listed above in Element # 5.

6.  Model of Care Training for Personnel and Provider Network
a.     Describe how the organization conducted initial and annual model of care training including training strategies and content (e.g., printed instructional materials, face-to-face training, web-based instruction, audio/video-conferencing, etc.)
b.     Describe how the organization assures and documents completion of training by the employed and contracted personnel (e.g., attendee lists, results of testing, web-based attendance confirmation, electronic training record, etc.)
c.     Describe who the organization  identified as personnel responsible for oversight of the model of care training
d.     Describe what actions the organization will take when the required model of care training has not been completed (e.g., contract evaluation mechanism, follow-up communication to personnel/providers, incentives for training completion, etc.)


7.  Health Risk Assessment
a.     Describe the health risk assessment tool the organization uses to identify the specialized needs of its beneficiaries (e.g., identifies medical, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive needs, medical and mental health history, etc.)
b.     Describe when and how the initial health risk assessment and annual reassessment is conducted for each beneficiary (e.g., initial assessment upon enrollment, annual reassessment within one year of last assessment; conducted by phone interview, face-to-face, written form completed by beneficiary, etc.)
c.     Describe the personnel who review, analyze, and stratify health care needs (e.g., professionally knowledgeable and credentialed such as physicians, nurses, restorative therapist, pharmacist, psychologist, etc.)

e.     Describe how the organization will ensure that initial HRAs for those individuals who are enrolled in the program at the time of program launch[1] are conducted for individuals who meet the criteria of a “Vulnerable Subpopulation” (as outlined in Element #10(a)) within 60 days of enrollment and for all other enrollees, within 90 days of enrollment. 

f.      Describe how the organization will ensure that HRAs for new enrollees who enter the Demonstration after the program’s launch[2] are conducted within 30 days of enrollment for EDCD Waiver participants;  within 60 days of enrollment for Vulnerable Subpopulation” (as outlined in Element #10(a)) (excluding EDCD Waiver participants); and, within 60 days of enrollment for all other enrollees.

g.     Describe how the organization will ensure that Level of Care (LOC) annual reassessments are conducted timely for EDCD Waiver participants (minimum within 365 days of the last annual reassessment).  For EDCD Waiver participants, describe how the organization will conduct annual face-to-face assessments (functional) for continued eligibility for the EDCD Waiver.  The LOC annual reassessment must  include all the elements on the DMAS 99-C LOC Review Instrument for individuals who are in the EDCD Waiver who have a change in status (available at: https://www.virginiamedicaid.dmas.virginia.gov/wps/portal).  LOC annual reassessments for EDCD Waiver participants must be performed by providers with the following qualifications: (i) a registered nurse licensed in Virginia with at least one year of experience as an RN; or (ii) an individual who holds at least a bachelor's degree in a health or human services field and has at least two years of experience working with individuals who are elderly and/or have disabilities.



8.  Individualized Care Plan
a.     Describe which personnel develops the individualized plan of care and how the beneficiary is involved in its development as feasible
b.     Describe the essential elements incorporated in the plan of care (e.g., results of health risk assessment, goals/objectives, specific services and benefits, outcome measures, preferences for care, add-on benefits and services for vulnerable beneficiaries such as disabled or those near the end-of-life, etc.) 
c.     Describe the personnel who review the care plan and how frequently the plan of care is reviewed and revised (e.g., developed by the interdisciplinary care team (ICT), beneficiary whenever feasible, and other pertinent specialists required by the beneficiary’s health needs; reviewed and revised annually and as a change in health status is identified, etc.)
d.     Describe how the plan of care is documented and where the documentation is maintained (e.g., accessible to interdisciplinary team, provider network, and beneficiary either in original form or copies; maintained in accordance with industry practices such as preserved from destruction, secured for privacy and confidentiality, etc.)
e.     Describe how the plan of care and any care plan revisions are communicated to the beneficiary, ICT, organization, and pertinent network providers.


f.      Describe how the organization will ensure that plans of care for all individuals who are enrolled in the program at the time of the program’s launch are conducted within 90 days of enrollment.  Participating Plans must honor all existing plans of care and prior authorizations (PAs) until the authorizations ends or 180 days from enrollment, whichever is sooner.  For EDCD Waiver participants, the plan of care must be developed and implemented by the Participating Plan no later than the end date of any existing PA.

g.     Describe how the organization will ensure that plans of care for new enrollees who enter the Demonstration after the program’s launch are conducted within the following timeframes:

h.     The plan shall develop a POC for each individual enrolled in the plan.  The POC will be tailored to individual needs, based on the plans method of stratification. The POC shall be updated and agreed to by the individual annually or upon reassessment resulting from a health status change. 
1.     Describe the method of stratification, the person-centered and culturally competent POC development process, and how its POC development process will incorporate and not duplicate Targeted Case Management.
2.     Describe how information from the Uniform Assessment Instrument and LOC will be incorporated into the plan of care for individuals in the EDCD Waiver. [3]
3.     Describe the organization’s process for obtaining nursing facility MDS data and how it will be incorporated into the POC.
4.     Describe how the organization will ensure that individuals in nursing facilities who wish to move to the community will be referred to the Money Follows the Person Program.
5.     Describe how the POC will address health, safety (including minimizing risk), and welfare of the participant.

i.      In addition to SNP Model of Care Element 8(b) listed above, describe the process the organization will use to include the following elements in the POC:

1.     Prioritized list of concerns, needs, and strengths;
2.     Attainable goals and outcome measures with target dates selected by the individual and/or caregiver;
3.     Strategies and actions, including interventions and services to be implemented and the person(s)/providers responsible for specific interventions/services and their frequency;
4.     Progress noting success, barriers or obstacles;
5.     Enrollee’s informal support network and services;
6.     Back up plans as appropriate (for EDCD Waiver participants using personal care and respite services) in the event that the scheduled provider(s) is unable to provide services;
7.     Determined need and plan to access community resources and non-covered services;
8.     Enrollee choice of services (including consumer-direction) and service providers; and
9.     Elements included in the DMAS-97AB form, (which can be downloaded from https://www.virginiamedicaid.dmas.virginia.gov/wps/portal) for individuals enrolled in the EDCD Waiver.

j.      Describe how the organization will ensure that reassessments and plan of care reviews are conducted:

9.  Communication Network
a.     Describe the organization’s structure for a communication network (e.g., web-based network, audio-conferencing, face-to-face meetings, etc.)
b.     Describe how the communication network connects the plan, providers, beneficiaries, public, and regulatory agencies
c.     Describe how the organization preserves aspects of communication as evidence of care (e.g., recordings, written minutes, newsletters, interactive web sites, etc.)
d.     Describe the personnel having oversight responsibility for monitoring and evaluating communication effectiveness


10.  Care Management for the Most Vulnerable Subpopulations
a.     Describe how the organization identifies its most vulnerable beneficiaries
b.     Describe the add-on services and benefits the organization delivers to its most vulnerable beneficiaries

For Element 10(a) “Vulnerable Subpopulations” shall include, at a minimum:
a.     Individuals enrolled in the Elderly or Disabled with Consumer Direction (EDCD) Waiver;
b.     Individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities;
c.     Individuals with cognitive or memory problems (e.g., dementia and traumatic brain injury);
d.     Individuals with physical or sensory disabilities;
e.     Individuals residing in nursing facilities;
f.      Individuals with serious and persistent mental illnesses;
g.     Individuals with end stage renal disease; and
h.     Individuals with complex or multiple chronic conditions.

11.  Performance and Health Outcome Measurement
a.     Describe how the organization will collect, analyze, report, and act on to evaluate the model of care (e.g., specific data sources, specific performance and outcome measures, etc.)
b.     Describe who will collect, analyze, report, and act on data to evaluate the model of care (e.g., internal quality specialists, contracted consultants, etc.)
c.     Describe how the organization will use the analyzed results of the performance measures to improve the model of care (e.g., internal committee, other structured mechanism, etc.)
d.     Describe how the evaluation of the model of care will be documented and preserved as evidence of the effectiveness of the model of care (e.g., electronic or print copies of its evaluation process, etc.)
e.     Describe the personnel having oversight responsibility for monitoring and evaluating the model of care effectiveness (e.g., quality assurance specialist, consultant with quality expertise, etc.)
f.      Describe how the organization will communicate improvements in the model of care to all stakeholders (e.g., a webpage for announcements, printed newsletters, bulletins, announcements, etc.)


Participating plans will be required to report on quality indicators to allow an evaluation of the impact on quality of care for enrollees. The CMS-required Core Quality Performance Measures (as determined) and the EDCD Waiver Performance Measures. Plans must also adhere to Medicaid managed care regulatory standards in 42 CFR 438.240.  All performance measures are subject to change per final three-way contract terms.

Plans will work with DMAS to monitor elements of the EDCD Waiver quality improvement strategy which must address assurances as required by CMS, including: (i) service plan, (ii) qualified providers, (iii) financial authority, (iv) health, safety, and welfare, (v) level of care; and (vi) administrative authority.

12.  Additional Element #1: Hospital and Nursing Facility Transition Programs
Describe the process, systems, and goals in detail for ensuring smooth transitions to and from hospitals, nursing facilities and the community, including:
a.     How the plan will ensure that communication of an admission or discharge will be conveyed to the PCP, care manager and home and community-based providers within 24 hours;
b.     How the plan will ensure that admissions and lengths of stay are appropriate to the individual’s needs;
c.     How the plan will ensure that there is timely and adequate discharge planning and medication reconciliation;
d.     How the plan will work to reduce the need for hospital transfers and emergency room use; and
e.     How the plan will work with nursing facility staff (including obtaining MDS Section Q data), hospital staff, and the state Long-Term Care Ombudsman to facilitate transitions to the community. This shall include how individuals are referred to local contact agencies in order to facilitate transitions and are linked with other community resources that provide support to individuals and their families/caregivers, such as Centers for Independent Living, Community Services Boards, and local Area Agencies on Aging, and MFP.

The plan shall describe how it will provide care management functions for all enrollees. 
At a minimum, all enrollees shall have access to the following supports:

1.     A single, toll-free point of contact for all questions;
2.     Develop, maintain and monitor the POC.
3.     Assurance that referrals result in timely appointments;
4.     Communication and education regarding available services and community resources; and
5.     Assistance developing self-management skills to effectively access and use services.


1.     Ensure that individuals receive needed medical and behavioral health services, preventative services, medications, LTSS, social services and enhanced benefits; this includes setting up appointments, in-person contacts as appropriate, strong working relationships between care managers and physicians; evidence-based patient education programs, and arranging transportation as needed.
2.     Monitor functional and health status;
3.     Ensure seamless transitions of care across specialties and settings;
4.     Ensure that individuals with disabilities have effective communication with health care providers and participate in making decisions with respect to treatment options;
5.     Connect individuals to services that promote community living and help avoid premature or unnecessary nursing facility placements;
6.     Coordinate with social service agencies (e.g. local departments of health, social services, Area Agencies on Aging, and Community Services Boards) and refer enrollees to state, local, and other community resources; and
7.     Work with nursing facilities to include management of chronic conditions, medication optimization, prevention of falls and pressure ulcers, and coordination of services beyond the scope of the NF benefit.

14.  Additional Element #3: Partnering with Community Care Management Providers

Describe any innovative arrangements the plan will use to provide care management. Plans are strongly encouraged to partner and/or contract with entities that currently perform care management and offer support services to individuals eligible for the Demonstration.  This flexibility includes the use of innovations such as health homes, sub-capitation, shared savings, and performance incentives. Entities can include, but are not limited to Community Services Boards (CSBs), adult day care centers, and nursing facilities.


[1] “At the time of program launch” includes the opt-in enrollment period and the passive enrollment period.  All days are calendar days. The “clock” begins on the plan effective date.
[2] “After the program’s launch” means ongoing enrollment. This starts in year 1 of the Demonstration, the month directly following the month that the plan receives members through passive enrollment.
[3] The UAI may be found at http://www.dss.virginia.gov/files/division/dfs/as/as_intro_page/forms/032-02-0168-01-eng.pdf  and the UAI User’s Manual may be found at
Pre-admission screening criteria is available in the Preadmission Screening manual at